Friday, October 28, 2011

Examples of Sharia Law

Please note that I have posted many articles on Sharia on this blog, the intent is for the reader to see different points of view. I am not endorsing any article but my own “Basics of Sharia” listed on the left panel.  As a Muslim it is obligatory for me to find the truth and not blindly believe in anything out there in the market.

It is important to understand the basics of Sharia, how it was formulated and how we can fix it.

1. Genesis of Sharia Law - http://sharialaws.blogspot.com/2013/02/genesis-of-sharia-law.html

2. Fixing Sharia Law - http://sharialaws.blogspot.com/2014/01/fixing-sharia-laws.html



The writer of the following article Hasan Mahmud is on the advisory board of World Muslim congress as I am. We have different points of view and both will be published, as an organization we have to practice diversity within and learn to respect the other point of view.

A new paradigm is in the making in setting the new standards for organizations. Prophet Muhammad in his last sermon said something to this effect, I am leaving this book to you for you to read and understand. Mind you he did not assign a clergy or anyone to interpret the book for us, because only you, you alone are accountable for the good and bad you do and it is your personal responsibility to find the truth. Tough but that is the truth.
 

Men have always turned things to their advantage, even willing to mistinterpet the Qur'an and pass it on as God's word.

My personal view is shaped by seeing the world as one unit, and I am a part of that universe, with fellow beings and matter that are connected to together in balance and my role (and your role) is to preserve that balance. Islam is about justness and fairness, it is about creating cohesive societies where no human has to live in apprehension, discomfort or fear of the other.  Islam - i.e, submission to a coherent well functioning system that God intended. God is not your, mine or any one's. God is a system that permeates through us all. God is the balance that keeps us together, and what is around us in balance. If we mess the balance and we have to fix it - for the ultimate good of all of us.

Some of the examples are ridiculous but are cultural, and passed out as religious. This congruence in practice and the faith is common in all faiths, including yours be it Christian, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu or any faith. Things will change, as they have over the last ten years that I have observed.

Mike Ghouse
Committed to building cohesive societies
www.Mikeghouse.net 
 # # #

Examples of Sharia Law
By Hasan Mahmud

Man is a very devious creature. I would say it is almost axiomatic. I am sure the Good Lord never intended for this to happen. But then he often grows too big for his shoes. In the quest for power over his fellow man, he is capable of going to great lengths to lord it over his peers, especially so when it comes to women. Oh! How he loves to tyrannize women! To make it look authentic he will quote the scriptures and if he cannot find any law in the scriptures to support his argument, he will formulate his own! And he will do it so seamlessly as to be almost indistinguishable from the real, that only a scholar will find the tell-tale marks of tampering.

A rough parallel could be drawn from everyday office work. Suppose we have a document in which we white-out a word, a sentence or perhaps a whole paragraph and type something in the same font over it and then photocopy this document. Scrutinizing this photocopy, even the most expert eye cannot detect the deception unless the original is consulted where proof of the tampering will be evident. I told you that sometimes man is too clever for his own good! He can create something out of thin air almost, so to say. In other words, he will spin an entire sherwani from whole cloth, if you get my meaning! To support my assertion I shall endeavor to quote a few examples from our venerable Sharia Laws.


Before I go to the examples proper, I would like to present the following example from my own pharmaceutical industry as something to ponder over allegorically speaking!


Suppose a medicine is marketed by a venerable pharmaceutical giant, as a panacea for all kinds of headaches. Experience nonetheless, shows that whether it does or does not cure headaches it definitely rather upsets the stomach! What are people to do with such a medicine?  This is the case with many Sharia laws as well. Most of the Sharia-supporters never read or explore the sources of these laws, and nearly no article either supporting or opposing Sharia law quote the laws. Now, let the laws from the most authentic sources tell us what they are. Once Muslims know what these laws are, it would be easier to convince them to replace these laws by secular laws, which are indeed in accordance with the principles laid down by Quran and Prophet.

THIS BLUE PRITN BELOW GOES TO THE CHAPTER ON SHARIA LAW.

Please note that Hudood, Diyat and Qisas cases are derived from the Quran and Prophet.

A.    Hudood cases are (1) Theft, (2) Robbery and Tyranny against State, (3) Adultery /Fornication, (4) Defamation, (5) Drinking and (7) Apostasy. Some sources also include “Running away from the battle field of Jihad” in Hudood.

B.  Opinions vary about laws of blood-money and retaliation for intentional and unintentional murder and bodily harm, Diyat and Qisas. In general (A) Diyat is money paid to victim’s family to get pardon (Nisa 92 – 93) and (B) Qisas is equal retaliation on the criminal (Mayedah 35).

C.   All other laws fall into Tazi’r section.  Minor differences are noted among different schools of law, e.g. Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanbli and Jaafri (Shiite law).  

These quotes bellow are from the world’s most authentic past and present sources, namely: -
(A)    Umdat Al Salik, (Reliance of a Traveller) by Imam Shafi’i, translated by Nu Ha Mim Keller. Al Azhar University of Egypt authenticated this book.

(B)     al-Hidaya: A Classical Manual of Hanafi Law translated by Charles Hamilton. This book isincluded as text in the Bar of London, England.

(C)    Islamic Laws – the Grand Ayatollah Sistani of Shiites – published in 1994

(D)   Codified Islamic Law – 3 Volumes compiled by a committee of six scholars, published by Islamic Foundation Bangladesh in 1995.

(E)    The Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence – By Dr. Hashim Kamali.

(F)    Text of Pakistan’s current Hudood Ordinance. 

(G)   Penal Law of Islam – Qazi publications 1979

(H)   Sharia the Islamic Law – Dr. Abdur Rahman Doi - 1997 

(I)      Criminal Law in Islam and the Muslim World - Dr. Tahir Mahmood, Institute of Objective Studies, New Delhi – India

(J)     Quranic Law and Punishments (?) - Principal, Lahore University Law department.

(K)    Women, the Family and Divorce Laws in Islamic History – Amira Azhary Sonbol.

(L)    Dween Ki Baatne - Maolana Ashraf Ali Thanwi, translation published in 1997 

Following are some of the Sharia Laws which I give forth as examples:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

1.   Denying “Scholarly consensus” about Sharia laws turns a Muslim to an apostate.[i]

2.  
Criminals of genocide, mass-rape, looting etc (Hiraba) will not be punished if they repent.[ii]

3.  
The Head of Islamic State cannot be charged in Hudood cases.[iii]

4.   
Proof of adultery and rape liable to Hudood shall be one of the following namely
       (1)  Either confession of the accused), or, (2) At least four Muslim adult male
       witnesses give evidence as eyewitnesses.[iv]

5.   
Men can marry and keep up to four wives at one time.[v]

6.   
Men can divorce wives instantly; in such case she gets no maintenance.[vi]        

7.   
A wife, if divorced in a regular manner in the course of two to three months gets   
maintenance only for maximum of 3 months.[vii]

8.  
To remarry the previous husband a divorced wife must marry another person, have sex with
      him and get divorced by him voluntarily. (Often the husband pronounces “Divorce”
      in a fit of anger and the Sharia Court forces the wife to marry a stranger, have sex with him
       and get voluntary divorce from him to remarry the previous husband).[viii]

9.  
The only way for a wife to get divorce is to convince the Sharia Court that will negotiate with
       the husband who often puts a monetary price for his approval. Without this, the woman
       cannot marry again.[ix]

10. 
Women’s testimony is not accepted in Hudood cases.[x]

11.  Evidence of a slave, female singer or a person of low-respect (street-sweeper, bath house
       attendant etc) is not admissible.[xi]

12.  Husbands are obliged to provide only food, clothes and accommodation to wives. Anything
        else including doctor’s fees, medicines etc is a charity to her. A rebellious wife does not
        get anything.[xii]

13.   Adoption is not allowed in Sharia.[xiii]

14.   Custody of kids goes to the mother provided she prays and does not marry a stranger
         No  such law is applicable to father. The father gets boys when they are 9 and girls when    they are 7 years old.  Kids belong to the father.[xiv]  

15.   A mother with custody of kids cannot go to distant places without permission of the father.[xv]

16.    A Muslim man is allowed to beat his disobedient wife or wives.[xvi]

17.   A Muslim man is allowed to have four wives at any given time. He is also allowed to  divorce the wife or wives instantly and marry other women.[xvii]

18.  Women inherit only half of what men do.[xviii]

19.  Women’s testimony in Business transactions is worth half of men’s.[xix]

20.  Women cannot be Bride’s guardians.[xx]

21.  Women’s Blood Money is half of men’s.[xxi]  


22.  The murderer has to pay blood money or compensation if the family members want it, as follows: [xxii]

100,000 riyals if the victim is a Muslim man

50,000 riyals if a Muslim woman

50,000 riyals if a Christian man

25,000 riyals if a Christian woman

6,666 riyals if a Hindu man

3,333 riyals if a Hindu woman”


23.  If the victim has son/s and daughter/s, then daughters cannot pardon the killer.[xxiii]        

24.  If a rapist cannot be punished, he has to pay bride-money without marrying (no other

          punishment is suggested).[xxiv]


25.   A Muslim shall not be put to death for murdering an unbeliever.[xxv]

26. Women’s witness is not accepted in Hudood cases.[xxvi]

27.  Women judges are not allowed in Hudood cases. [xxvii]

28. The Presiding Officer of the court shall be a Muslim. In the cases where the accused is a non-  Muslim, the Presiding Officer may be a non-Muslim.[xxviii]  

29. Testimony of a non-Muslim for false accusation is inadmissible. If s/he later becomes a Muslim, her/his evidence is then admissible. XXXX ADD REFERENCE

30.  No retaliation for parents and grandparents for killing their offsprings. [xxix]

31.  The husband is not obliged to pay for his wife’s cosmetics, doctors fees, the purchase of medicine for her, and similar expenses.[xxx]

32.  No reason is required to divorce one’s wife.[xxxi]

33.  It is recommended for a woman to wear a covering over her head (khimar), a full-length shift, and a heavy slip under it that does not cling to the body.[xxxii]


34.  A majority of scholars (n: with the exception of some Hanafis, as at m2.8 ibid) have been recorded as holding that it is unlawful for women to leave the house with faces unveiled, whether or not there is likelihood of temptation. It is unlawful for women to be alone with a marriageable man. [xxxiii]

35. In Shiite law a man can marry a woman for a fixed time from few seconds to several
years.[xxxiv]  Rich men from the Middle East travel to Southern India to take advantage of
this law on poor women, so do rich Iranian men with their women. The suffering of
 those women and children born out of this practice is beyond comprehension.

36. If a woman claims to be having her period but her husband does not believe her, it is lawful
 for him to have sexual intercourse with her.[xxxv]

37. The Caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians (if they don’t become
 Muslims or pay Jiziya tax) and the war continues.[xxxvi]

38. Being unyielding towards the unbelievers, hard against them and detesting them …..is a
 decree of Allah. [xxxvii]

Mere review of these laws illustrates the inherent injustice in them. Any effort made to justify them in the name of religion is the works of motivated men to perpetuate oppression of women and other disadvantaged class of people. These laws are not derived from the Quran, if anything; Quran has been misinterpreted to support these laws. It is obvious that these laws cannot serve justice. That is why the claim of radical Islamists that Sharia laws had served justice in the past is totally unfounded, as shown in another chapter.

It is a matter of the legacy of patriarchal attitude of human history in general. I submit below a short list of Hadiths (Prophet’s Examples) that amply demonstrates this attitude and what we have been saying all along, namely, the supercilious and brow-beating attitude of a patriarchal society towards its own women!  Many of the Sharia laws are created based on these and other similar corrupt documents.

1.  Wife must shave her pubic hair if husband returns home at night after a long journey.[xxxviii]

2.  A man will not be asked in hereafter as to why he beat his wife.[xxxix]

3.  If a woman is to prostrate to another person (besides Allah) it will be her husband.[xl]

4. Women can visit mosques but must not wear perfume. [xli]

5. A divorced woman must marry another man and must intercourse before she can remarry her former husband.[xlii]

6. Majority of women are in hell.[xliii].

7. One must seek Allah's refuge from women, slaves and camels.[xliv]

8.  If a woman abandons her husband’s bed for the night then the angels curse her until morning. [xlv]

9.  Prayer is annulled by a passing woman, dog and a monkey.[xlvi]  

10.   A woman enters slavery of her husband in marriage.[xlvii]

11.    A woman is like a rib---that is why she has the crookedness.[xlviii]

12.  Nothing is more harmful to men than women.[xlix]

13.  A woman advances and retires in the shape of a devil; so when one of you sees a woman, he should come to his wife and have intercourse with her.  [l]

14.  The house, the wife and the horse are bad luck.[li]

15.   Women are more harmful to men than anything else.[lii]

16.  Because of Eve women are unfaithful towards their husbands. [liii]

17.   A husband should not tell his wife secrets, amount of property…etc. no musical instruments for her. [liv]

18.  Women should beg a man not to divorce her.[lv]

19.  Marriage gives the man the right to enjoy a woman's “private parts”.[lvi]

20. There is no maintenance allowance or lodging for the wife who has been given an irrevocable    divorce.[lvii]

21.  Some Jihadis had sex with the captive women in the presence of their husbands and some were reluctant to do so.[lviii]

22. One can have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is clear of her period and/or delivery. If she has a husband then her marriage is abrogated after she becomes a captive.[lix]  

23.  Companion of the Prophet had sex with booty captive women. [lx]

24. Some Jihadis practiced coitus interruption with captive women.[lxi]

25.  A woman can’t travel a day’s journey without her mahram. [lxii]

26. Menstruation is a defect in women for they cannot fast and pray during their periods.[lxiii]

27.  People ruled by a woman will never be successful.[lxiv]

28. Muhammad has no concern for a woman who cries loudly, shaves her hair and tears her  clothes in bereavement. [lxv]

To undo the wrongdoings of centuries, is a daunting task and obviously cannot be undertaken overnight. But we have to start somewhere. The cat has to be belled surely?

To all the aye sayers and the nay sayers to Sharia Law, I humbly suggest that they do it with full knowledge. Read up on the laws and ponder over them. That, for the nonce may aid in loosening some tough mental knots, paving the way for a just and peaceful society, Inshallah!

Please do read the Genesis of Sharia after reading this piece- http://sharialaws.blogspot.com/2013/02/genesis-of-sharia-law.html 


[i] Shafi law# o8.7.7
 [ii] Codified Islamic Law Vol 1 - law#13
[iii] (a) Hanafi Law Hedaya page 188, (b) Codified Islamic Law Vol 3 Law# 914C
[iv] (a) Shafi’i Law # o.24.9, (b) Text of Pakistan’s Hudood Ordinances#7 of 1979 amended by 8B of 1980,
      (c)  Qura’an translated by Muhiuddin Khan, pages –239 and 928 (Tafsir- explanation section)
[v] All Sharia schools
[vi] (a) Hanafi Law –Page 81 and 523, (b) Shafi’i Law# n3.2, n3.5 (Instant but not under compulsion), (c) Deen Ki Bnate
             - Maolana Ashraf Ali Thanvi- page 254 Law 1537, 1538, 1546 and 2555, (d) Website - Sunnipath.com
[vii] (a) Hanafi Law-Page 145, (b) Shafi’i Law- Page 546 Law#m.11.10.3
[viii] (a) Islamic Laws – Grand Ayatollah Sistani – page 469 Law# 2536, (b) Hanafi Law –Page 15, (c) Shafi’i
               Law - Page 673 Law# P.29.1, (d) Maksudul Mumeneen – page 231, (e) Deen Ki Bnate – Maolana
               Ashraf Ali Thanvi page 252 Law# 1543 – (2)
[ix] (a) Hanafi Law –Page 112, (b) Shafi’i Law# n.5.0, n7-7& w-52-1-253-255, (c)Sharia the Islamic Law- Dr. Abdur
             Rahman Doi - page 192.
[x] (a) Hanafi Law-Page 353, (b) Shafi’i Law- page 638 Law#o.24.9, (c) Criminal Law in Islam and the Muslim
               World –page 251, (d) Tafsir of Translation of the Qura’an by Muhiuddin Khan page 239, (e)
   Penal Law of Islam – page 44, 45 (Quote - “The evidence of women is originally inadmissible on
   account of their weakness of understanding, their want of memory and incapacity of governing” –
   Unquote)
[xi] (a) Hanafi Law –Page 361, (b) Shafi’i Law- page 636 Law#o.24.3.3
[xii] (a) Hanafi Law-Page 140, (b) Shafi’i Law- Page 544 Law#m.11.4, (c) Tafsir of Translation of the
                  Qura’an by Muhiuddin Khan page 867.
[xiii] (a) Sharia the Islamic Law – Dr. Abdur Rahman Doi – page 463, (b) all Sharia books
[xiv](a) Shafi’i Law- Page 550 Law#m.13.0, (b) Hanafi Law-Page 138-139
[xv] (a) Codified Islamic Law Vol 1 Law# 405, (b) Iranian Law
[xvi] (a) Shafi’i Law# m.10.12 Page-541 & o.17.4 Page 619, (b) All Sharia schools
[xvii] (a) Hanafi Law- Page 31, (b) Sharia the Islamic Law – Dr. Abdur Rahman Doi - page 147 etc.
[xviii] All schools of Sharia Law
[xix] (a) Shafi’i Law- Page 637 Law#o.24.7, (b) Hanafi Law-Page 352
[xx] (a) Hanafi Law-Page 138-139, (b) Shafi’i Law# m.3.4.1- page 518)
[xxi] (a) Shafi’i Law# o4.9
       [xxii] Wall Street Journal, 9th April 2002        
       [xxiii] (a) Sharia the Islamic Law – Dr. Abdur Rahman Doi - page 235
[xxiv] (a) Shafi’i Law #m.8.10 page 535, (b) Codified Islamic Law
[xxv] Penal Law of Islam – page 149, Shafi law # o1.2, o2.2
       [xxvi] (a) Shafi law 0.24.9, (b) Hanafi law page 176, (c) Codified Islamic Law Vol 1 # 133 and (d) Vol 2 # 554,
            (e) The penal Law of Islam page 44 and (f) Quranic Tafsir (Bangla) of Muhiuddin Khan Pages 239, 928.
        [xxvii] Codified Islamic Law Vol 2 # 576
 [xxviii]  (a) “Criminal Law in Islam and the Muslim World”-Institute of Objective Studies, New Delhi – Pages-
               251, 445 and 448, (b)  Tafsir of the Qura’an, translated by Muhiuddin Khan, page – 928 (Check  ADD PENAL LAW OF ISLAM)
       [xxix] (a) Shafi law# n2.4, (b) Codified Islamic law Vol XXXX
        [xxx] (a) Shafi’i Law m11.4 (b) ADD MUHIUDDIN
       [xxxi] (a) Sharia the Islamic Law- Dr. Abdur Rahman Doi, p173.
        [xxxii] Shafi’i Law f5.6
        [xxxiii] Shafi’i Law m2.3
 [xxxiv] Mut’a Marriage, - Sharia of Shia sect. It is not allowed in Suuni law.
        [xxxv] Shafi’i law e.13.5
[xxxvi] Shafi’ law o9.8
[xxxvii] Shafi law #w59.2
      [xxxviii] Sahi   Bukhari 7.62.173
        [xxxix] Sunaan Abu Dawood 11.2142.
        [xl] (Sunaan Abu Dawood 11.2135).
        [xli] Sunaan Abu Dawood 2.0565
       [xlii] Malik’s Muwatta 28.7.18
        [xliii] Shahih Bukhari 1.6.301
        [xliv] Sunaan Abu Dawood 11.2155
        [xlv] Shahih Muslim 8.3366.
        [xlvi] Shahih Bukhari 1.9.490
       [xlvii] Ehiya Ulum Al Deen – Imam Gazzali Vol 2 Page XX  - XX Publications
        [xlviii] Shahih Bukhari 7.62.113
        [xlix] Shahih Bukhari 7.62.33
        [l] Shahih Muslim 8.3240
        [li] Shahih Muslim 26.5523
        [lii] Shahih Muslim 36.6603
        [liii] Shahih Muslim 8.3471
       [liv] Page 675 - A Dictionary of Islam, 1994 by T.P Hughes; Publisher Kazi Publications, Inc. 3023-27 West
     Belmont Avenue, Chicago, IL 60618
       [lv] Shahih Bukhari 7.62.134
       [lvi] Shahih Bukhari ;7.62.81
       [lvii] Shahih Muslim 3514 and 3530
       [lviii] Sunaan Abu Dawood 11.2150
       [lix] Shahih Muslim 8.3432.
       [lx] Shahih Bukhari 5.59.637
       [lxi] Shahih Bukhari 7.62.137
       [lxii] Shahih Muslim 7.3105
       [lxiii] Shahih Bukhari 3.31.172
       [lxiv] Shahih Bukhari 5.59.709
       [lxv] Shahih Muslim 1.0187, 0188

Sharia Comes to Libya (Thank You America)

The following article by Tarek Fatah seems to be based on inexplicable hate for Sharia. It seems he is too eager to appease the right wing gang rather than dissecting and pointing the mis-applications and flaws in the Sharia laws. In absence of any laws in a nation, Sharia serves the justice, however, a few parts of the law are not about justice and the misapplications continue although they are about the same percentage of misapplications in any legal system. Please read my article http://sharialaws.blogspot.com/2011/07/sharia-in-one-gulp.html for clarity of my position.

Mike Ghouse

Sharia Comes to Libya (Thank You America)
by Tarek Fatah
If George Bush's adventures ended up handing Iraq on a silver platter to America's enemies in Iran, President Obama's softer and gentler imperialism has been the catalyst that stands to deliver North Africa into the hands of the anti-American Muslim Brotherhood. Dumb and Dumber could hardly ask for a better cast.
After over 5,000 dead American soldiers and over a trillion dollars spent fighting the "war on terrorism," what happened in Benghazi on Sunday, Oct. 23, 2011 sums up the colossal failure of U.S. foreign policy vis-à-vis the Muslim world.
Standing before cheering crowds, and in the shadow of war crimes committed by his troops, the new interim leader of Libya, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, declared in his 'liberation' address that Sharia law would govern the new Libya. Sharia is of course the source of the doctrine of jihad that triggered the attack on America on 9/11.
Mustafa Abdel Jalil was careful in not uttering the word 'jihad' that is obligatory to anyone following the application of Sharia in the public domain. Jalil instead trumpeted the more salacious aspect of Sharia:
"We as a Muslim nation have taken Islamic Sharia as the source of legislation, therefore any law that contradicts the principles of Islam is legally nullified. This includes changing marriage laws to allow men to more easily take on a second wife."
America and NATO had not just helped place an Islamist regime in Tripoli, but had driven the country a full 40 years back by introducing polygamy in a society that had long ago rejected the institution. As if the prospect of multiple wives was not enough, Jalil sent the crowds into what the Washington Post reporter Mary Beth Sheridan described as "thunderous applause" when he proclaimed the introduction of Sharia banking. "The interest [on loans] will be ruled out. You will not pay it anymore," he promised. (Ironically his promise of interest-free banking came at a time Canada's leading interest-free Sharia institution went bankrupt.)
Free money and free sex; new Libya was on a roll. Jihad, or holy war against the infidel, an integral part of Sharia, would have to wait and better remain unsaid. Al-Qaeda supporters were smiling. The most prominent among them is Abdel Hakim Belhaj, the bearded former emir of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
As for the secular liberal Libyans, people like Mahmoud Jibril, Mahmoud Shammam, and Ali Tarhouni, who sold the revolution to the West and made NATO intervention politically palatable, they were now in the back seat or totally eclipsed. Remember Iran in 1979?
U.S. and Sharia in Libya
For the U.S., this is not the first time it has had to deal with Tripoli invoking Sharia as its guiding principles in foreign and domestic policy.
The two countries first made contact in 1785 when Thomas Jefferson and John Adams had to deal with Abd al-Rahman al-Ajar, the representative of the pasha of Tripoli to sort out a dispute the Libyans felt was their right under Sharia's laws of jihad.
What transpired between the two American founding fathers and the nobleman from Tripoli would be the United States' first exposure to the sense of entitlement with which most Muslim rulers governed -- and still do. These caliphs and sultans considered their rule to be a God-given trusteeship, with an obligation to conduct first dawah* and then jihad† as part of Sharia.
In the late 18th century, the United States had no navy, while the North African Muslim states, including Tripoli, had a combined naval strength that rivalled their European neighbours and facilitated the largely undocumented European slave trade -- white men enslaved to work in Africa.
In the 1780s American merchant ships in the Mediterranean, having lost the protection of the British Navy, were subject to attack by pirates and slave traders from Morocco, Tripoli, Tunis, and Algiers. Jefferson and Adams, recognizing the limits of U.S. naval power, were meeting with Abd al-Rahman al-Ajar to offer him a tribute of $25,000 in exchange for his protection. The French were already paying. Jefferson told al-Ajar that although the United States was "eager to avert bloodshed" and therefore willing "to offer a treaty of lasting friendship with Tripoli," he was intrigued and wanted to know under what moral authority the Muslim nobleman was demanding the bribe.
Tripoli's ambassador gave the two Americans a crash course in Sharia as laid into law by medieval Muslim theologians, who did not consider such a tribute as a bribe, but rather an interim arrangement until the non-Muslim party accepted the invitation to Islam or was conquered by force of arms.
Ambassador al-Ajar told the two Americans:
"It was... written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their [Muslims'] authority were sinners, that it was their [Muslims'] right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle would surely go to paradise."
Jefferson and Adams were taken aback. They had just glimpsed the mindset that drew inspiration from the medieval application of jihad. Most Muslim rulers from the earliest caliphates to the Ottomans of the 18th century self-righteously saw themselves as saviours of the human race, "Shadows of God on Earth," and thus entitled to rule.
From the perspective of the Tripoli official, the United States was a non-Muslim Christian entity. It was perfectly justifiable for him to ask for the tribute, since the United States had not accepted the Muslim caliphate's invitation to Islam.
The link between "inviting the infidels" to the fold of Islam and demanding a tribute if they turned the invitation down was sanctioned by most medieval Islamic scholars in the ninth and 10th centuries. Imam Muslim (d. 875) -- in his collection of the sayings of Prophet Muhammad, Sahih Muslim -- indicates that a dawah is the first of three "courses of action" to be undertaken prior to war with non-Muslim enemies. In 1368, Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri wrote the classic work of Shafi Islamic law, Umdat as-salik (Reliance of the Traveller). In his book, al-Masri is quite frank about the link between dawah and jihad:
"The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax jaziyah -- which is significance of their paying it, not the money itself -- while remaining in their ancestral religions) and the war continues until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax in accordance with the word of Allah Most High."
The doctrine of Sharia sanctioned armed jihad against the non-Muslim "enemy" would take on a more robust and political form in the early 20th-century interpretations among such Islamist scholars as the trio mentioned earlier in this chapter: Hassan al Banna, Abul Ala Maudoodi, and Syed Qutb.
These men have laid the foundation of a new form of jihad, patterned on the tradition of the underground communist parties of Europe and at times resembling the anarchists of the 19th century. Today, it has evolved into a form of a death cult, where the highest level of Islamic worship is to die and leave this world to its "satanic existence." This blending of the death cult and jihad has translated into the martyrdom sought by so many brainwashed young Muslim men and women.
While many Islamists in the West are careful about what they say to the media, Islamists from the Muslim world are not so guarded. Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani was a Sharia judge in Pakistan's Supreme Court and one of the world's most respected Islamic scholars. The learned judge, who advises many multinational companies on Sharia banking and halal investments (like the one proposed by the new Libyan leadership) is a regular visitor to Britain, where in 2007 he declared in a The Times interview that Muslims should wage military jihad "to establish the supremacy of Islam" worldwide.
He told the newspaper that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain, where they have the freedom to practise Islam, but only until they gain enough power to engage in battle. He told the prestigious Times:
"The question is whether aggressive battle is by itself commendable or not. If it is, why should the Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did Islam not stop it in the past?"
He then proceeded to answer his own question:
"Even in those days... aggressive jihads were waged... because it was truly commendable for establishing the grandeur of the religion of Allah."
The booklet Call to Jihad by the founder of Jamaat-e-Islami is sold in most Islamic bookstores in North America and is distributed by Muslim youth organizations on campuses. Maudoodi urges young Muslims to consider themselves under attack if any Muslim country is threatened.
He writes that it is "the categorical injunction of the Islamic shariah that whenever an enemy attacks any part of darul Islam (the Muslim world), Jihad for its defence becomes obligatory (fard) on every Muslim."
Maudoodi makes another significant clarification. He writes that even though jihad is separate from qetal (warfare), they are complementary. He says warfare may end, but jihad does not. He writes:
"In terms of Shariah or Islamic Law, Jihad and Qetal are two separate things. Qetal is actual warfare and clash of arms of the fighting forces against the armies of the enemy. The Jihad on the other hand means the struggle as a whole -- the entire war effort which the nation collectively puts forth in order to achieve the objective for which war takes place. In the course of Jihad, Qetal is, at times, put off or temporarily suspended, but Jihad goes on and continues until the object for which it was undertaken is realized."
Another prominent Islamist, the Egyptian Syed Qutb had this to say about sharia in his book, Milestones:
"Any place where Islamic shariah is not enforced and where Islam is not dominant becomes the Home of Hostility (Dar-ul-Harb)... A Muslim will remain prepared to fight against it, whether it be his birth place or a place where his relatives reside or where his property or any other material interests are located."
With the installation of Islamists in Libya, the election of so called "moderate" Islamists (whatever that means) and the upcoming Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt, Osama bin Laden must be smiling in his watery grave at the bottom of the Arabian Sea. With Dumb or Dumber at the wheel, the American ship is headed for disaster while the rest of us cannot get up from our slumber.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

American Muslims against shari‘ah law in America

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
American Muslims speak out against the enforcement of shari‘ah law in America

Islamic Coalition announces support for Michigan legislation that will bar state courts from enforcing ‘foreign law’ above U.S. and state constitution

WASHINGTON, DC (September 7, 2011) – A coalition of diverse American Muslim leaders has announced support for a proposed bill in the Michigan State Assembly, HB 4679, that is intended to bar Michigan courts from enforcing any foreign law, if doing so violates any rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and/or the state of Michigan’s constitution.

Like many Americans, members of the American Islamic Leadership Coalition (AILC) have been observing the efforts of a growing number of state legislatures, which are seeking to address the incompatibility of various shari‘ah court systems around the world with the principles and foundations of our Constitutional republic and its laws. As American Muslims, we believe that the law should treat people of all faiths equally, while protecting Muslims and non-Muslims alike from extremist attempts to use the legal instrument of shari‘ah (also known as Islamic jurisprudence, or fiqh) to incubate, within the West, a highly politicized and dangerous understanding of Islam that is generally known as “Islamism,” or “radical Islam.”

We see no evidence that statutes like HB 4769 will adversely impact the free exercise of our personal pietistic observance of Islam, which is not in conflict with the U.S. or Michigan constitutions. We recognize that not only Muslims, but also Jews, Christians and all people of faith need the government to protect their right to peaceful assembly, mediation and arbitration free of coercion, but also within the bounds of American constitutional principles. Therefore, we stand together as a diverse coalition in support of any legislation that serves to protect and integrate our communities into the fabric of this great nation, by strengthening our accountability to the laws of the land, and the constitutions of the various states in which we live.

As American Muslims we are conscious of the fact that Muslim Brotherhood legacy groups and other Islamists and their surrogates in the U.S. are trying their best to portray any opposition to manifestations of shari‘ah law as “racism” and “discrimination against Muslims.” However, as a coalition of traditional, liberal and secular Muslim Americans, we denounce this fear-mongering and playing of the race card, which only serves to mask the Islamists’ highly politicized agenda. According to AILC member C. Holland Taylor, “the Islamist agenda threatens not only the well-being of the United States and its inhabitants, but also undermines and distorts the highest principles of Islam itself.”

“Michigan House Bill 4769 seeks to ensure that American Muslims can live in freedom and safety, in accordance with our constitutional principles, and not be enveloped by the tentacles of medieval, man-made laws that have been falsely accorded divine status,” said the AILC.

“To equate Bill 4769 to racism is not only dishonest, but is a poor and clumsy attempt at making ordinary Muslim Americans feel alien in their own homeland, while creating a rift between Muslims and the rest of our country,” said AILC member Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser.

Michigan House Bill 4769 states:

“[To] ...limit the application and enforcement by a court, arbitrator, or administrative body of foreign laws that would impair constitutional rights; to provide for modification or voiding of certain contractual provisions or agreements that would result in a violation of constitutional rights; and to require a court, arbitrator, or administrative body to take certain actions to prevent violation of constitutional rights.”

The AILC statement reinforces the American Muslim community's commitment to the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and the separation between religion and state. Unfortunately, Islamist groups would like to compromise this separation and provide cover to medieval, misogynistic and homophobic laws that no Muslim is obligated to demand as public law.

“Shari‘ah law, wherever it has been applied in the public domain, be it in Iran, Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, has resulted in untold misery and oppression of Muslims, in particular Muslim women, by Islamists and dictators who invoke shari‘ah law to justify their rule,” said AILC member Manda Ervin. “Many of us fled the Muslim world to escape shari‘ah law and to practice Islam in our personal lives, by moving to the USA and other western countries. We do not wish these laws to follow us here,” she concluded.

The Michigan state senators are not alone in expressing concern about foreign laws creeping into North America under the guise of religious freedom. Many Muslim academics, religious scholars and human rights activists have voiced their concern.

The contrast between what has occurred in Britain and in Canada provides a roadmap for how the U.S. may address these legal issues. In Britain, shari‘ah arbitration courts have been allowed to assume virtually unchecked control of legal arrangements in many Muslim communities. This is creating a ghettoized, medieval and separatist state within Britain. In Canada, however, local Muslims led strong opposition to the Islamists’ shari‘ah agenda and were successful in preventing its implementation, thereby sparing our Northern neighbor the fate of so many Muslims in the United Kingdom, where women are commonly subjected to forced marriage and the denial of basic human rights.

“We Muslims in Canada defeated an attempt by Islamists to sneak shari‘ah law into Ontario,” said AILC member Tarek Fatah, who has been on the front lines of this struggle for many years. “We recognized the damage shari‘ah had inflicted on Muslims in the UK, and its oppressive nature in Muslim-majority countries, and decided to oppose it. We urge American Muslims not to succumb to the Islamists’ propaganda, and to back the Michigan Bill, which will protect Muslims and non-Muslims alike from the impact of foreign laws that violate the U.S. or Michigan constitutions.”

About the American Islamic Leadership Coalition (AILC)

The American Islamic Leadership Coalition (AILC) is a diverse coalition of liberty-minded, North American Muslim leaders and organizations. AILC’s mission advocates for defending the US Constitution, upholding religious pluralism, protecting American security and cherishing genuine diversity in the faith and practice of Islam. AILC provides a stark alternative to the Islamist organizations that claim to speak for what are diverse American Muslim communities. For more information on AILC, please visit our website at http://www.americanislamicleadership.org/.

AILC Coalition Signatories

Bahman Batmanghelidj
Founding Member
Alliance for Democracy in Iran
Virginia, USA
Manda Zand Ervin
President
Maryland, USA
M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D.
President
Phoenix, AZ

Farid Ghadry
President
Washington, DC
Jamal Hasan
Baltimore, MD
C. Holland Taylor
Chairman & CEO
Winston-Salem, NC
Tarek Fatah
Founder
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Member, Advisory Board
Dallas, TX
Behrooz Sarshar
Virginia, USA
Past President
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jalal Zuberi, MD
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Atlanta, GA



MEDIA CONTACT:

Gregg Edgar

Gordon C. James Public Relations

gedgar@gcjpr.com 602-690-7977

###