In an article “Hindutva’s stick” AG Noorani wrote a lot of
fascinating things about Indian Personal Laws, and I am focusing on the Sharia aspect of it, as I had written similar sentences in another article, both are presented here.
“The real issue is not the civil code. It is reform of Muslim
Personal Law, which flagrantly violates the Sharia, the law ordained by the
Quran. The perverted law now in force is oppressive to women, specifically the
arbitrary triple divorce and polygamy. It is not Sharia that is followed in
this but the “Anglo-Muhammadan” law of British times. The All India Muslim
Personal Law Board is in the grip of dinosaurs. A besieged community is a
conservative community. It clings to what is left of its identity. Since
Independence, the Muslim community has been exploited either by the “sarkari
musalman” who acts as adalal (agent) between the state and the country’s
Muslims, the quintessential Uncle Tom, or the reactionaries who control the
board or the bogus secularism of some “secular” parties.”
Jawaharlal Nehru had to wage a battle within his own party,
the Congress, against Hindu communalists. Muslims witnessed his helplessness,
suffered in the never-ending riots, saw the erosion of constitutional
safeguards and the attacks on Urdu, and faced the wrath of the rising forces of
Hindutva. They withdrew into their own suffocating shell. The nation is poorer
for that.
The issue, then, is the reform of Muslim Personal Law.
Pressures for its abrogation by the uniform civil code retard the progress for reform. Professor J.N.D.
Anderson noted: “It is the family law that has always represented the very
heart of the shariah, for it is the part of the law that is regarded
by Muslims as entering into the very warp and woof of their religion.” It has
been “basic to Islamic society down the centuries”. This was why in 1931 the
Congress Working Committee declared that “personal laws shall be protected by
specific provisions to be embodied in the Constitution”. Nehru assured Mohammad
Ali Jinnah, in a letter dated April 6, 1938, that the Congress had “declared
that it does not wish to interfere in any way with the personal law of any community”.
Law Minister G.S. Pathak said in the Lok Sabha on May 17, 1966, that “personal
laws are mixed up with religion” and that “we cannot coerce people to accept
our views about their religion and customs”. Earlier, a similar assurance was
given in the Lok Sabha by Law Minister A.K. Sen on August 29, 1963.”
The full article is at: http://mikeghouseforindia.blogspot.com/2015/11/hindutvas-stick-against-muslims.html
The full article is at: http://mikeghouseforindia.blogspot.com/2015/11/hindutvas-stick-against-muslims.html
My note as preface to the article Muslim women facing arbitrary divorce at http://sharialaws.blogspot.com/2015/10/muslim-women-facing-arbitrary-divorce.html
There is God's (Quranic) Sharia which is just and equitable, and there is man's sharia which is selfish and cruel.
There is God's (Quranic) Sharia which is just and equitable, and there is man's sharia which is selfish and cruel.
In
case of a divorce, the Quranic Sharia calls for separation for at least three
months, while making efforts to reconcile the differences, if reconciliation is
not possible then comes the divorce, where the man takes full responsibility
for child support and alimony if the woman has no other source of income.God's
law is common sense. (Genesis of Sharia Law)
However,
what Muslims have been practicing is Man's (Male's) Sharia, believing that it
is the divine law, and it is not. It is misogynistic and does not care about
woman. The guy can say the word divorce three times, and the life that was
built over a life time can be done away in a minute. Women constantly live in
the fear of this ugly pronouncement and it is not acceptable. No human should
live in apprehension, particularly the married women in a society where the are
dependent.
This
has got to go, unless we are just to fellow beings, our spiritual growth is
incomplete. Being just amounts to being Godly or being spiritual or achieving
Taqwa.
Thanks
God for giving courage to Muslim women in India to take the bold step of
calling to get rid of this ungodly law.
Dr. Mike Ghouse is a community consultant, social scientist, thinker, writer and a speaker on Pluralism, Interfaith, Islam, politics, human rights, foreign policy and building cohesive societies. Mike offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. More about him in 63 links at www.MikeGhouse.net and his writings are at TheGhousediary.com
Dr. Mike Ghouse is a community consultant, social scientist, thinker, writer and a speaker on Pluralism, Interfaith, Islam, politics, human rights, foreign policy and building cohesive societies. Mike offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. More about him in 63 links at www.MikeGhouse.net and his writings are at TheGhousediary.com
This is such a great resource that you providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing websites that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. It is the old what goes around comes around routine.
ReplyDeleteNew York prenup lawyer